Thread: God vs Evolution, can't we all just get along? (NOVA: Intelligent Design on Trial)
View Single Post
Old 02.11.2009, 03:00 PM   #60
!@#$%!
invito al cielo
 
!@#$%!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,732
!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob Instigator
YES. they are all DNA based life forms, using the exact same proteins and amino acids to create their forms, all from ONE COMMON ANCESTOR

couldn't those aminoacids have organized independently in different places? sort of like life in other planets?

im still thinking of the miller experiment. from that "primordial soup", one and only one? that would be dawkins's "selfish gene"... self replication encoded & taking over the muck.

so one and only one gene ever did that? that's pretty amazing. can someone post me a link to an article about that? please? i'd love to read the findings...

--
i found this:
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=940DEED9143DF937A2575 2C0A96E948260

"Dr. James A. Lake of University of California in Los Angeles who conducted the genetic study, said the results were not quite what he had expected, but were determined by computer analysis of a great deal of data. But the conclusions are a matter of some dispute. Some evolution specialists consider the work important and original. Others disagree strongly."

that was back in... 1988!

i'll keep looking-- thanks.
!@#$%! is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|