View Single Post
Old 02.11.2009, 12:46 PM   #40
Lurker
invito al cielo
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: No. 10
Posts: 3,289
Lurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuchFriendsAreDangerous
I didn't say evolution should not be taught in the classroom..

I said that the Darwinian theory of Evolution, (ie, the process of natural selection, that the origin of all things is a result of this process) should not be taught as an absolute fact, when it is no fact at all, but rather a great great theory which I also accept, but not as an absolute fact, because I could never ACTUALLY know about evolution the way I can know about other principles of science which I can observe and experience directly. I can put light through a prism and KNOW for a FACT that in white light is all the colors of the rainbow, but how could I ever know that I evolved from sulfur bacteria at the bottom of the ocean 3.5 billion years ago?

Good science asks questions, and the way evolution is presented today in biology books DOES not encourage questioning..

today science folks get as defensive about evolution as religious folks get about the Bible, it is fucking ridiculous..


IT IS NOT TAUGHT AS ABSOLUTE FACT! STOP LYING! With the prism how do you know that actually some other phenomena is happening? Maybe instead of splitting the light it is actually changing the colour of the light and the angle that the light goes through the prism decides this? I'm not actually doubting that the light is split but I am demonstrating your hypocrisy and willful ignorance.
Lurker is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|