[SuchFriendsAreDangerous]

my two cents:

Science today thinks it is the Gospel of the past.

There are no absolutes, and scientists should not think so. The problem is that both sides of this debate believe they have access to the absolute truth, an the reality is that is simply absurd!

as i said, no one truly knows anything and everything about anything.

When talking about evolution and natural selection folks talk about millions and billions of years like they were there! News flash, fossils, DNA evidence and good ideas are not exactly a first-hand account...

and religious folks talk about Creation and God like they were there to witness it..

News flash, God is a mystery, and if you could possibly know everything or even anything about God, then He would not be God.

Science is not the Gospel, the Gospel is not a a science book, and neither of the two have any true proof that ALL of what they say is correct.

The middle ground is where to stand in this regard, building a consensus rather then a divide. Both parties need to come down from the mountain where they think they are divine..

science, you don't know shit, you were not there millions of years ago, how do you know all of your good ideas are actually correct?

religion, the whole point of religion is that you CANT know everything, then you'd be God instead of worshiping God.