Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Robert Schunk
The implications of this are that the Committees of the House of Representatives may, in accordance with customary Anglo-American legal principles, proceed as an office of prosecuting attorneys, interrogating witnesses in secrecy and without benefit of confrontation of witnesses nor even public knowledge of the very existence of the proceedings, not to mention their details.
|
With the witnesses having already been decided, their testimony already known......what are they crossing examining?
Isn’t this the absence of Anglo-American juror prudence?