View Single Post
Old 06.24.2014, 03:54 PM   #4854
demonrail666
invito al cielo
 
demonrail666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 18,510
demonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuchFriendsAreDangerous
If Suarez is allowed to play I'm not quite sure I can ever watch FIFA again, period, end of discussion. The corruption of international politics and economics is bad enough pill to swallow, but at least we had the game itself to enjoy? If they are politically and economically corrupt AND blatantly corrupting the game at a fundamental level that was just witnessed by literally BILLIONS of eyes and will be on constant GIF loop across Twitter for days??? That would be waving the white flag.

When an NBA ref who was involved in a crucial 2007 NBA playoff series that ended on some very controversial officiating to say the least (that is, euphemistically) subsequently plead guilty to fixing 54 NBA games and served 14 months in Federal prison in 2008, I stopped watching basketball entirely for 4 years, and really only begrudgingly embraced it again, albeit with the caveat of acknowledging that it all could be good fiction, but hey, I like novels and movies.

That being said, my brain can only handle one fictional sport at a time

I don't think you need worry that if they can prove Suarez bit him he'll be banned probably for the rest of the tournament at least. There might be some problem proving it but I can't imagine what. There is corruption in football but I don't see this being the kind of decision it affects. Why would FIFA not want to ban him if they can prove it?
demonrail666 is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|