Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SonicBebs
This is interesting (and another palace post, sorry)
Motd showed palace had 13% possession against arsenal.
A mate who watched it on sky said they quoted 39%.
Motd singled out Chamaq as being poor, yet a neutral stated he won everything in the air and played well
Its said that palace fans have been critical online of motd coverage and punditary and so motd are deliberately miss representing palaces games
A lot of punditary is subjective but to get a stat so wrong makes you wonder...
|
Hmm be interesting to see what the BBC would say if pressed about that.
With the Chamaq thing. There's been so any times where one person has said such-and-such a player was terrible, then another has said said player was actually pretty good.
It kinda brings that quote "nobody really knows anything" to mind.