View Single Post
Old 07.22.2013, 04:09 PM   #67
!@#$%!
invito al cielo
 
!@#$%!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,732
!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuchFriendsAreDangerous
Notice this map from today's headline in NY Times about "In Climbing the Income Ladder, Location Matters"

 


Hmm.. the predominantly black regions are conspicuously hard to climb the ladder

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/22/bu...ml?ref=us&_r=0

crabs in a bucket?

nah, i'm just fucking with you and i don't really believe that (though i see a lot of it, i don't think it's the cause of these demographic trends). i see that map and i wonder about it, but correlation is not causation, and contrary to what you believe it's not all a white man conspiracy to keep the black man down. there are many reasons why the poor stay poor. but yes, atrocious schooling can be racialized, etc. but it's not all.

what about white appalachians though? how do you interpret their permanent state of blight? they live in those same areas, by the way.


 
!@#$%! is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|