Quote:
|
Originally Posted by !@#$%!
yeah it was a brutal defeat, but come on, for a moment, they thought they had a chance. "if only", etc.
i "see" her/it as more of a teenager (13+ up?) but this is about the creatures of capitalism rather than "women".
|
It seemed clear from the empowered context that such women were in their 20s rather than teens. Teenage girls don't assert half as much power and influence as 20-something women, and yet 20-something women always have that same appeal as teenage girls, if not more so. How are women NOT creatures of capitalism?
Again. Stop bogarting the interpretations. That is what literature is for. You can read it your way, and your insights are cool, valid, and important. HOWEVER, they don't negate anyone else opinions simply because they only half-agree with yours. I've conceded that the book was about macro-economics, but the microscopic analysis was again through the lens of the young woman, who are also the driving force of most economies as they have been for 100,000 years or so
