Yeah, hevusa, in your continuing quest to dig yourself into a hole of total and absolute stupidity, you could have
at least misquoted me or done another one of those awesome quote mash-up things you did earlier, and took out the "probably". See, because, now -- and thank you, Joe, for pointing it out and saving me the trouble -- it
totally negates your entire point, since "probably"/"maybe"/"possibly"/etc isn't, nor has ever been, "DEFINITELY", and therefore, there was no contradiction in my original opinion. Of course there's fucking
doubt --
that's the point. Who would EVER say "GOD DEFINITELY EXISTS" or "GOD DEFINITELY DOESN'T EXIST"? More important, who gives a fuck? See, it's exactly your type of idiocy that makes religion hard to take seriously. See, and what's even funnier is, I COMPLETELY clarified my position further in other posts, in stuff you have to, like, read and shit, about 500 things you failed to address -- BUT EVEN THE SHIT YOU QUOTED DIDN'T PROVE ANY POINT ON YOUR BEHALF! You've lost, man.
See, what you've actually done -- this is hilarious -- is made me seem even more thoughtful by the quotes you've chosen (even the mashed-up one)! Come on, dude, you could have at least done a classic troll "misquote" move, maybe you're not able to earn that skill at your experience level. Keep trying to level up -- I suggest another thread, as this one has clearly been way too deep for you.
Since you seem to not be aware of this... there are many types of agnosticism. Your silly little freedictionary link is just like your DERRR "idiotic" troll posts: simple and shallow. A few lines doesn't even begin to cover agnostic atheism, agnostic theism, ignosticism, apathetic/pragmatic agnosticism, strong agnosticism, and weak agnosticism -- all completely different forms of agnosticism, and I'm sure that anyone who actually thinks about this sort of, you know, STUFF (for lack of a better word -- trying to use small words now, the ones you can understand reasonably) -- will probably change their stance as they continue to, you know, THINK ABOUT STUFF.
In other words: yeah, today I might identify with agnostic theism, but a few years back I was a bit more pragmatic in my points of view. The main point of my original post is that I don't believe in any sort of "religion" but having read the Bible all the way through twice, as well as the Satanic Bible, I actually find a lot of intelligent points in both -- though most of it is common sense, in both cases.
Here, have some help...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnostic ... again, WARNING, THERE MAY OR MAY NOT BE BIG WORDS.
Wait for it, guys... I think he might actually be ready to say "you're an idiot" again...
You do realize, like, 6 or 7 people who have read this and replied have said you're the idiot here? That you have no chance to win? That you have failed to say
anything smart in the history of this board, and definitely not in this thread? Maybe you should stop while you're behind.