who is this, i am mesmerized

what, no richard kern links yet?



mmm, lydia lunch

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OrE1LqLRD8

anyway there was that other

wtf is that mullet shes sporting in that video.

shush, minor

i revoked my statement (although it is an extremely applicable one these days)


the mullet must go though

i've never paid attention to her haircuts but to that mouth she's got

mmm-mmmm-mmmmm....

that woman there in the photo is not lydia lunch though

by the way (just in case) (you never know)

i had this video too with lung leg it's somewhere but i won't look for it

no it wasn't lung leg was it linda serbu? who was it

note to self: become a pornographer

oh here it is

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mrOt6JVwv1w

she was pretty hot back in the day but i snuck into the teenage jesus show the other night. she looks like shit.



lung leg >>> lydia

Hazel Dooney, duh?

in ubuweb it was better-- it's somewhere-- let's see

no está

wow she looks far less attractive on google images than i had previously been tricked into believing

way to go quasar!

good fucking has nothing to do with looks

heres a less censored version of x is y-- it's not pixelated, but it's preceded by a horrid commercial for insecure women (some skin care shit) (or whatever lottery you might get)

--

ok, here (i forgot the link)

http://www.veoh.com/browse/videos/ca...20832268gMxyRq

yeah but i couldn't fuck someone who i didn't want to look at. sex is attraction.



i'd have to double bag that bitch

that's cuz you're a minor

um, no.



it's because i have standards.

what were you saying?

sorry, i fell asleep...

go back to bed grandpa.

ha ha ha cankersores, i hope that when you're 60 you've grown the personality to make up for the destruction of your good looks--- i predict you'll go toothless and haggard (an educated guess).

if you rely on the visuals too much you'll eventually become some botoxed suburban bitch like those orange county housewives-- ha ha ha ha--- those ridiculous people who never grew up where it counts.

fortunately you've got the raw material to become some sort of natural disaster like those that strike coastal cities in september, but only if you give up the silly crutches.

the joke's on you, i'll probably be dead by the time i'm old enough to look like shit.

im sure there will be other people looking at you, and the mirror mostly.

my point is (was) that there are plenty of homely people who are super hot in the sack, and in my own experience, hotter than pretty people.

i was checking out for example lydia lunch's photos on her website and yeah they are nothing to post on playboy-- but do you have any idea of what that short chubby body is capable of doing in the sack? no, of course you have no idea-- it's all eyes for you. but the flesh has its own energies and passions that are not photographable.

anyway, you're not stupid, so you'll learn eventually. it just cracks me up to hear you make such proclamations, is all-- but don't get me wrong, i do respect the boldness with which you champion your errors-- it's just that sometimes you need a boot to the head and i'm happy to provide ha ha ha.

my definition of what is sexually attractive is incredibly varied, particularly among women. i know goddamn well what all sorts of bodies are capable of.

you have no idea what you're talking about.


now.

it is the combination of good sex AND physical attraction that makes it good.

you got me?

alright. good.

get off the internet and go work on your book.




ps
this is not to say i give a fuck what anyone looks like in everyday life. beauty fades.

roley poley short man feeling less than loved?

ha ha ha --- NOOOOOOO! sometimes the attractive people turn out to be jackasses! sometimes the girl that makes you flinch slightly has the sweetest pussy! sometimes the beautiful people are so into themselves they might as well not be there and are boring!

sometimes you go against the grain of superficial taste & discover unexpected surprises, secret beauties, buried treasures! (sometimes it's just pure shit, ha ha, o well).

but it's like learning to appreciate a good blue cheese with its sligth smell of vomit and yet so delicious.

haa ha aha haaa

anyway, i bet lydia lunch is rocking better than ever, and i'd give her a hard spanking!


yes. that i should. thank you.

Live fast, die young, leave a beautiful corpse.

I am 100% attracted mostly to (society's definition of) not-100%-attractive people, usually.

i have to be attracted to someone before i fuck them, is that not the way it usually goes? why am i getting so much shit for this?!? shut the fuck up!

ha ha, quite the contrary

im praising the virtues of worn-out women

bearers of such strange delights

thats what you get for dissing with lydia lunch & her throaty orgasms, ha ha ha.

hot damn, im the new atari (he did beatles, laurie anderson, etc)

I'd rather have a chick who is a little mature in the sack. I dunno. My last girlfriend was a virgin (well, not a blowjob virgin, but that's a different story) so I taught her everything she knows, haha. It was kinda cool, but it took years to have really good sex, but at the end there yeah.. it was amazing. But it was always really awkward and odd, which I liked, because straight sex doesn't do anything for me, I like it to have this weirdness. But I was with another girl before who'd been kinda worn out and she just rocked my world, fucking deep throating and all this shit, so that was cool too.

I dunno where I'm going with this.

OH, I remember... um, every girl is really interesting sexually.

whats that thing blake said, the road of excess leads to the palace of wisdom? yeah...

Excess, in what way? Post count? Hah.

postorrhea


damn, i just realized she was projectin'!

Pot kettle black, post man.

ha ha ha we have almost the same numbers

i blame my one-sentence posts and insomnia

Me too.

....oh, and me too!

im not racing